<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flame for Thought &#124; A Calgary Flames blog &#187; Kings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flameforthought.com/tag/kings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flameforthought.com</link>
	<description>A Calgary Flames blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sun-belted again!</title>
		<link>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/21/sun-belted-again/</link>
		<comments>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/21/sun-belted-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Parkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Sedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Bettman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Gelinas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flameforthought.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversy surrounding the Vancouver&#8217;s disallowed goal in Monday&#8217;s Canucks-Kings game has a familiar ring to it, doesn&#8217;t it? Flames fans know it well &#8211; it&#8217;s the clanging of that old &#8220;NHL wants sunbelt teams to win&#8221; bell again.
In case you missed it, the NHL video-review dudes ruled that Daniel Sedin kicked in a third-period goal that would have brought the Canucks within one in a key contest against the Kings. NHL exec Mike Murphy does a decent job of explaining the ruling to CBC&#8217;s hockey panel, but still (as much as I loathe the Canucks and it pains me to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The controversy surrounding the Vancouver&#8217;s disallowed goal in Monday&#8217;s Canucks-Kings game has a familiar ring to it, doesn&#8217;t it? Flames fans know it well &#8211; it&#8217;s the clanging of that old &#8220;NHL wants sunbelt teams to win&#8221; bell again.</p>
<p>In case you missed it, the NHL video-review dudes ruled that <a title="Daniel Sedin kicked in" href="http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/Sports/Stanley_Cup_Playoffs/ID=1473457543">Daniel Sedin kicked in</a> a third-period goal that would have brought the Canucks within one in a key contest against the Kings. NHL exec Mike Murphy does a decent job of explaining the ruling to CBC&#8217;s hockey panel, but still (as much as I loathe the Canucks and it pains me to side with their fans), something doesn&#8217;t smell quite right about this one.</p>
<p>Admittedly, the NHL&#8217;s rules on kicked-in pucks are fuzzy and constantly evolving, but at very least it&#8217;s fair to say the application of the rule here wasn&#8217;t consistent with what fans saw for much of the regular season. Sedin certainly appears to turn his foot to ensure that the puck redirects off it, but there&#8217;s no distinct skate-off-the-ice kick that fits the league&#8217;s usual criteria for disallowing a goal off a skate.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just a bad call, or at least a borderline one that could have gone either way, a judgement call. Maybe the league has been adjusting its kicked-goal definition to include intentional redirects such as this one, and just sort of forgot to tell the media and the public. Maybe.</p>
<p>But fans in Vancouver (at least when they decide to actually care), are apparently a paranoid bunch. The calls quickly went out that the fix is in, that the NHL wants the Kings to win because it has a lot invested in hockey in the U.S. sunbelt, and could really use a team from those hockey-indifferent markets getting deep into the playoffs.</p>
<p>Like I said, sounds familiar to Flames fans. But for Calgary, the fix was on a Stanley Cup-winning goal that wasn&#8217;t to be &#8211; and that the NHL officials didn&#8217;t even bother to review.</p>
<p>Cast your memory back to Game 6 of the 2004 Stanley Cup Final, third period. The Flames&#8217; Oleg Saprykin throws the puck in front of the Tampa Bay net, where Martin Gelinas is crashing hard. Puck hits Marty&#8217;s skate, and Nikolai Khabibulin kicks it out. The best of all the replays (one the NHL replay judges had no access to), shows the puck clearly over the line.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRJ4hYZO8AU">A computer-generated analysis from a U.S. network days later </a> suggests that maybe it wasn&#8217;t quite over the line, and even diehard Flames fans have to admit that it was extremely close. But the point is, the on-ice officials never even bothered to stop the game and request a video review. (The NHL only looked at it after the fact, as they heard the uproar from the Flames faithful and sought to cover their butts.)</p>
<p>Now, maybe the NHL was wary of awarding a potentially Cup-winning goal on a controversial replay call, but the conspiracy theorists quickly claimed that the league wanted Tampa to win, because so much of its business strategy was built on succeeding in sunbelt-market cities. And now, six years later, we have the accusation arising again.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/globe-on-hockey/the-nhls-image-problem-in-bc/article1541166/">Matthew Sekeres of The Globe and Mail argues in a blog today</a>,  the NHL has brought this on itself. Gary Bettman&#8217;s ceaseless boosterism of sunbelt markets and under-appreciation of Canadian markets, both in words and actions, has created a clear impression that at the league&#8217;s top levels, it desperately wants sunbelt teams succeed &#8211; even, perhaps, at the expense of others.</p>
<p>Maybe the on-ice conspiracies are more imagined than real, but when you show preferential treatment for years to certain teams in certain markets the way Bettman has, you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised when fans in neglected, unappreciated, taken-for-granted markets start to seriously doubt your integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/21/sun-belted-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loyalties</title>
		<link>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/15/loyalties/</link>
		<comments>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/15/loyalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Iain Godsman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wil Wheaton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flameforthought.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I follow Wil Wheaton on Twitter (@wilw) because I&#8217;m a complete nerd and he is the King of Nerds.
If you don&#8217;t recognize the name, he was Wesley Crusher on &#8220;Star Trek the Next Generation&#8221; and also starred alongside River Phoenix, Corey Feldman, Jerry O&#8217;Connell and Kiefer Sutherland in the fanatastic &#8220;Stand By Me&#8220;.  He also happens to be a hockey freak (as is movie director Kevin Smith of &#8220;Clerks&#8221;, &#8220;Zak and Miri Make a Porno&#8221;, and &#8220;Cop Out&#8221; fame. He&#8217;s AKA Silent Bob, and you can find him on Twitter as @ThatKevinSmith). Wheaton roots for the Kings, Smith is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow Wil Wheaton on Twitter (@wilw) because I&#8217;m a complete nerd and he is the King of Nerds.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t recognize the name, he was Wesley Crusher on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092455/" target="_blank">&#8220;Star Trek the Next Generation&#8221;</a> and also starred alongside River Phoenix, Corey Feldman, Jerry O&#8217;Connell and Kiefer Sutherland in the fanatastic &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092005/" target="_blank">Stand By Me</a>&#8220;.  He also happens to be a hockey freak (as is <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0003620/" target="_blank">movie director Kevin Smith</a> of &#8220;Clerks&#8221;, &#8220;Zak and Miri Make a Porno&#8221;, and &#8220;Cop Out&#8221; fame. He&#8217;s AKA Silent Bob, and you can find him on Twitter as @ThatKevinSmith). <a href="http://twitpic.com/1fjkex " target="_blank">Wheaton roots for the Kings</a>, <a href="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.fanhouse.com/media/2008/04/kevin-smith040808.jpg" target="_blank">Smith is a Devils fan</a>. Both will be tweeting like crazy throughout the playoffs. They are knowledgeable and frequently very funny.</p>
<p>Anyways&#8230;</p>
<p>I saw this tweet from Wil this morning and it made me laugh, so I&#8217;m passing it along (for context, he&#8217;s in Vancouver right now filming):</p>
<p>Guy: Sorry you&#8217;re a Kings fan.<br />
Me: Sorry there&#8217;s 6 games left for you.<br />
Guy: Oh, I&#8217;m a Habs fan.<br />
Me: Oh! Sorry there&#8217;s 4 games left for you.</p>
<p>I also liked this tweet:</p>
<p>You know what, Canada? I like you. You&#8217;re not like the other countries, here on the continent. (With apologies to the Dead Milkmen)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flameforthought.com/2010/04/15/loyalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
